ThreatsDay: Adobe RCE, DNS 钱包盗窃, NVIDIA 容器逃逸, 自愈后门 + 另外 23 个 · 3h Silent Lynx 利用 WinRAR 漏洞在独立国家联合体政府攻击中部署反向 Shell · 6h NGINX 修复 5 个漏洞,包括可能的 RCE 和可能跳过客户端证书检查的 TLS 漏洞 · 9h Next.js 发布了针对缓存和 SVG 处理中的两个关键 RCE 漏洞的紧急补丁 · 9h Drupal 修补了通过贡献模块无需登录路径的关键核心 RCE 漏洞 · 10h Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect软件中的漏洞 · 10h Curl 修复了由 Anthropic 发现的“高” RCE 漏洞 · 10h Slican电话交换机中的漏洞 · 11h Palo Alto Networks警告防火墙安全漏洞被滥用 · 14h 思科报告称Secure Email Gateway中的关键漏洞被积极利用 · 15h ThreatsDay: Adobe RCE, DNS 钱包盗窃, NVIDIA 容器逃逸, 自愈后门 + 另外 23 个 · 3h Silent Lynx 利用 WinRAR 漏洞在独立国家联合体政府攻击中部署反向 Shell · 6h NGINX 修复 5 个漏洞,包括可能的 RCE 和可能跳过客户端证书检查的 TLS 漏洞 · 9h Next.js 发布了针对缓存和 SVG 处理中的两个关键 RCE 漏洞的紧急补丁 · 9h Drupal 修补了通过贡献模块无需登录路径的关键核心 RCE 漏洞 · 10h Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect软件中的漏洞 · 10h Curl 修复了由 Anthropic 发现的“高” RCE 漏洞 · 10h Slican电话交换机中的漏洞 · 11h Palo Alto Networks警告防火墙安全漏洞被滥用 · 14h 思科报告称Secure Email Gateway中的关键漏洞被积极利用 · 15h
🛡️
ACyber Sentinel 安全评估团队
← 返回
⚡ 情报报告

CISA报告Linux内核中三项漏洞的积极利用

网络安全和基础设施安全局(CISA)警告称,Linux内核中的三项漏洞正在被积极利用。这些漏洞分别是CVE-2025-39682、CVE-2025-39964和CVE-2026-53266。这些漏洞的影响程度在1到10的范围内评估,分别为9.8、7.8和8.8(CVSS评分)。

CVE-2025-39682涉及TLS接收路径中的“对不寻常或异常条件的不当检查”。这可能导致拒绝服务。CVE-2025-39964是一个竞争条件,可能导致拒绝服务或“数据完整性问题”。最后,CVE-2026-53266是netfilter的SNAT模块中的一个漏洞,可能被利用来执行本地特权升级攻击。

CISA维护着一个被积极攻击的漏洞列表,并已将上述漏洞添加到其中。美国政府机构被指示在三天内修复这些漏洞。目前,所有漏洞的补丁均已发布。

相关漏洞

CVE-2026-53266 CVSS 8.8 HIGH Analyzed
CVE-2026-53266 - Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability - [Actively Exploited]
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable The ebtables SNAT target keeps the Ethernet source address rewrite behind skb_ensure_writable(skb, 0). This is intentional: at the bridge ebtables hooks the Ethernet header is addressed through skb_mac_header()/eth_hdr(), while skb->data points at the Ethernet payload. Asking skb_ensure_writable() for ETH_HLEN bytes would check the payload, not the Ethernet header, and would reintroduce the small packet regression fixed by commit 63137bc5882a. However, the optional ARP sender hardware address rewrite is different. It writes through skb_store_bits() at an offset relative to skb->data: skb_store_bits(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr), info->mac, ETH_ALEN) skb_header_pointer() only safely reads the ARP header; it does not make the later sender hardware address range writable. If that range is still held in a nonlinear skb fragment backed by a splice-imported file page, skb_store_bits() maps the frag page and copies the new MAC address directly into it. Ensure the ARP SHA range is writable before reading the ARP header and before calling skb_store_bits().
CVE-2025-39964 CVSS 7.8 HIGH Analyzed
CVE-2025-39964 - Linux Kernel Race Condition Vulnerability - [Actively Exploited]
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: af_alg - Disallow concurrent writes in af_alg_sendmsg Issuing two writes to the same af_alg socket is bogus as the data will be interleaved in an unpredictable fashion. Furthermore, concurrent writes may create inconsistencies in the internal socket state. Disallow this by adding a new ctx->write field that indiciates exclusive ownership for writing.
CVE-2025-39682 CVSS 9.8 CRITICAL Analyzed
CVE-2025-39682 - Linux Kernel Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions Vulnerability - [Actively Exploited]
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list Each recvmsg() call must process either - only contiguous DATA records (any number of them) - one non-DATA record If the next record has different type than what has already been processed we break out of the main processing loop. If the record has already been decrypted (which may be the case for TLS 1.3 where we don't know type until decryption) we queue the pending record to the rx_list. Next recvmsg() will pick it up from there. Queuing the skb to rx_list after zero-copy decrypt is not possible, since in that case we decrypted directly to the user space buffer, and we don't have an skb to queue (darg.skb points to the ciphertext skb for access to metadata like length). Only data records are allowed zero-copy, and we break the processing loop after each non-data record. So we should never zero-copy and then find out that the record type has changed. The corner case we missed is when the initial record comes from rx_list, and it's zero length.